nanog mailing list archives
Re: network name 101100010100110.net
From: Joe Hamelin <joe () nethead com>
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 21:59:41 -0700
On Saturday night, Day Domes <daydomes () gmail com> postulated:
I am thinking of using 101100010100110.net does anyone see any issues with this?
It's truly unsigned? (15 bit) -- Joe Hamelin, W7COM, Tulalip, WA, 360-474-7474
Current thread:
- network name 101100010100110.net Day Domes (Oct 16)
- Re: network name 101100010100110.net Joe Hamelin (Oct 16)
- Re: network name 101100010100110.net Day Domes (Oct 16)
- Re: network name 101100010100110.net Joe Hamelin (Oct 16)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: network name 101100010100110.net Day Domes (Oct 16)
- Re: network name 101100010100110.net Day Domes (Oct 16)
- Re: network name 101100010100110.net Joe Hamelin (Oct 16)
- Re: network name 101100010100110.net Per Carlson (Oct 16)
- Re: network name 101100010100110.net Matthew Palmer (Oct 16)
- Re: network name 101100010100110.net Joe Hamelin (Oct 16)
- Re: network name 101100010100110.net Matthew Palmer (Oct 16)
- Re: network name 101100010100110.net James Hess (Oct 17)
- Re: network name 101100010100110.net bmanning (Oct 17)
- Re: network name 101100010100110.net Mark Andrews (Oct 17)
- Re: network name 101100010100110.net Joe Hamelin (Oct 17)
- Re: network name 101100010100110.net bmanning (Oct 17)