nanog mailing list archives
Re: New hijacking - Done via via good old-fashioned Identity Theft
From: Ben McGinnes <ben () adversary org>
Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 13:44:49 +1100
On 7/10/10 6:28 AM, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
On 10/6/10 10:34 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:Number resources are not and should not be associated with domain resources at the policy level. This would make absolutely no sense whatsoever.hmm. ... "are not" ... so the event complained of ... didn't happen?
The key issue here is more the "should not" aspect, which I agree with, but that these records are frequently used by netops to verify a request. There really needs to be a greater standardised level of due diligence regarding advertisement requests that checks more than whether a request is coming from a seemingly legitimate email address. Regards, Ben
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Current thread:
- Re: New hijacking - Done via via good old-fashioned Identity Theft, (continued)
- Re: New hijacking - Done via via good old-fashioned Identity Theft Leen Besselink (Oct 07)
- Re: New hijacking - Done via via good old-fashioned Identity Theft Ben McGinnes (Oct 07)
- Re: New hijacking - Done via via good old-fashioned Identity Theft Joe Greco (Oct 08)
- Re: New hijacking - Done via via good old-fashioned Identity Theft Sven Olaf Kamphuis (Oct 09)
- Re: New hijacking - Done via via good old-fashioned Identity Theft Joe Greco (Oct 09)
- Re: New hijacking - Done via via good old-fashioned Identity Theft Nick Hilliard (Oct 07)
- Re: New hijacking - Done via via good old-fashioned Identity Theft Ben McGinnes (Oct 06)
- Re: New hijacking - Done via via good old-fashioned Identity Theft Owen DeLong (Oct 06)
- Re: New hijacking - Done via via good old-fashioned Identity Theft Eric Brunner-Williams (Oct 06)
- Re: New hijacking - Done via via good old-fashioned Identity Theft Ben McGinnes (Oct 06)
- Re: New hijacking - Done via via good old-fashioned Identity Theft Sven Olaf Kamphuis (Oct 07)