nanog mailing list archives

Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408)


From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 00:45:46 -0700


On Oct 4, 2010, at 1:59 PM, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:

On Mon, 04 Oct 2010 13:30:55 PDT, Owen DeLong said:

Removing a few points probably isn't a bad idea so long as you have a list of
domains for which points should be added.

140 million .coms. Throw-away domains. I do believe that Marcus Ranum had
"trying to enumerate badness" on his list of "Six stupidest security ideas".
This won't scale as long as you have more spammers adding new domains faster
than your NOC staff can add them to the blacklist.

Yes, getting rid of domain tasting and taking some other steps to bring sanity
to the domain name process would really help, IMHO.

(And even centralized blacklists run by dedicated organizations haven't solved
the problem yet, so I'm not holding my breath waiting for that to work out...)

Fair enough. It's not a panacea, but, it can be a component of a solution.

Owen



Current thread: