nanog mailing list archives
Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408)
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 00:45:46 -0700
On Oct 4, 2010, at 1:59 PM, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
On Mon, 04 Oct 2010 13:30:55 PDT, Owen DeLong said:Removing a few points probably isn't a bad idea so long as you have a list of domains for which points should be added.140 million .coms. Throw-away domains. I do believe that Marcus Ranum had "trying to enumerate badness" on his list of "Six stupidest security ideas". This won't scale as long as you have more spammers adding new domains faster than your NOC staff can add them to the blacklist.
Yes, getting rid of domain tasting and taking some other steps to bring sanity to the domain name process would really help, IMHO.
(And even centralized blacklists run by dedicated organizations haven't solved the problem yet, so I'm not holding my breath waiting for that to work out...)
Fair enough. It's not a panacea, but, it can be a component of a solution. Owen
Current thread:
- do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) Greg Whynott (Oct 04)
- RE: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) Nathan Eisenberg (Oct 04)
- Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) John Adams (Oct 04)
- Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) Michael Thomas (Oct 04)
- Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) John Adams (Oct 04)
- Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) Michael Thomas (Oct 04)
- Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) Owen DeLong (Oct 04)
- Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 04)
- Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) Suresh Ramasubramanian (Oct 04)
- Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 04)
- Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) Owen DeLong (Oct 05)
- Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) Michael Thomas (Oct 04)
- Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) Greg Whynott (Oct 04)