![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408)
From: Greg Whynott <Greg.Whynott () oicr on ca>
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 14:54:15 -0400
i think it was an observation they made, and suggestions to make things better. I don't think the message was "fix this or you'll be off the air one day.". if they have a 56k port speed(stuck in the 80's), there is potential there for a DoS from a large volume of spam back splatter.. 8) over all, I'm inclined to accept your assumptions. -g On Oct 4, 2010, at 2:38 PM, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Greg Whynott <Greg.Whynott () oicr on ca> wrote:A partner had a security audit done on their site. The report said they were at risk of a DoS due to the fact they didn't have a SPF record.This is pure unadulterated BS from someone who doesnt understand either DDOS mitigation, or SPF .. or more likely both. -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists () gmail com)
Current thread:
- Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408), (continued)
- Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 04)
- Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) Suresh Ramasubramanian (Oct 04)
- Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 04)
- Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) Owen DeLong (Oct 05)
- Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) Greg Whynott (Oct 04)
- Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) Michael Loftis (Oct 04)
- Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) Greg Whynott (Oct 04)
- Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) Stefan Bethke (Oct 05)
- Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) Douglas Otis (Oct 05)
- RE: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) Nathan Eisenberg (Oct 04)
- Re: do you use SPF TXT RRs? (RFC4408) Jared Mauch (Oct 04)