Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast's Actions

[Ren Provo <ren.provo () gmail com>]

http://blog.comcast.com/2010/11/comcast-comments-on-level-3.html

On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Dave CROCKER <dhc2 () dcrocker net> wrote:

> On 11/29/2010 2:40 PM, Rettke, Brian wrote:
>
> > Essentially, the question is who has to pay for the infrastructure to
> > support
> > the bandwidth requirements of all of these new and booming streaming
> > ventures. I can understand both the side taken by Comcast, and the side of
> > the content provider, but I don't think it's as simple as the slogans
> > spewed
> > out regarding "Net Neutrality", which has become so misused and abused as
> > a
> > term that I don't think it has any credulous value remaining.
>
>
> I find it helpful to distinguish "participant neutrality" from "service
> neutrality".  The first says that you and I pay the same rate.  The second
> says the my email costs the same as my voip.
>
> As described, it appears that Level3 is being singled out, which makes for
> participant non-neutrality.  On the other hand, if Comcast were charging
> itself for xfinity traffic, this might qualify as service non-neutrality
> (assuming there is a plausible meaning to "charging itself"...
>
> d/
>
> --
>
>  Dave Crocker
>  Brandenburg InternetWorking
>  bbiw.net