nanog mailing list archives
RE: OT: VM slicing and dicing
From: David Hubbard <dhubbard () dino hostasaurus com>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 08:56:24 -0500
From: Brandon Kim [mailto:brandon.kim () brandontek com]
One question I do have for any that actually read through this entire email (haha) is about the physical network switch. Is there a case for the switch, especially in today's high density environment to go with 1GIG switches as the minimum? It seems pretty obvious but I'm wondering if it's really a necessity? Can anyone on this list argue that 10/100 will be suffice?
If you're going to do iscsi, 10/100 will be pitiful for performance. If it's just carrying the guest (VM) traffic, 100 mbit is fine.
Current thread:
- Re: OT: VM slicing and dicing, (continued)
- Re: OT: VM slicing and dicing Charles N Wyble (Nov 12)
- Re: OT: VM slicing and dicing Mike Fedyk (Nov 15)
- Re: OT: VM slicing and dicing Raymond Macharia (Nov 15)
- Re: OT: VM slicing and dicing Alex Kamiru (Nov 15)
- RE: OT: VM slicing and dicing Brandon Kim (Nov 15)
- RE: OT: VM slicing and dicing Robert Brockway (Nov 16)
- RE: OT: VM slicing and dicing Brandon Kim (Nov 15)
- Re: OT: VM slicing and dicing James Hess (Nov 15)
- RE: OT: VM slicing and dicing Brandon Kim (Nov 16)
- RE: OT: VM slicing and dicing Holmes,David A (Nov 16)
- RE: OT: VM slicing and dicing Brandon Kim (Nov 16)
- Re: OT: VM slicing and dicing chaim rieger (Nov 09)
- RE: OT: VM slicing and dicing David Hubbard (Nov 16)