nanog mailing list archives

Re: Redundant BGP for lower cost


From: Jack Carrozzo <jack () crepinc com>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 12:23:56 -0500

If you want to keep it cheap, roll out another Quagga edge - one to each
peer. Drop default into OSPF from both edges, iBGP over a GE between them.
If one toasts you'll only lose half your routes for 1s-ish, or however long
you set your OSPF keepalives.

While you're at it, add extra fans and run the edge systems off solid state
disks or CF cards.

Or, buy $real hardware.

-Jack Carrozzo

On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Alex Thurlow <alex () blastro com> wrote:

Let me preface this by saying that I'm not a full time network admin, but
we're a small company and I'm the only one handling this.  Our budget is
also not huge, but we're at the point where extended downtime would cost us
enough money that we can spend some money to fix the problem.

 Here's my situation:  I have two providers, each handing me gigabit
ethernet.  I'm getting full BGP feeds and handling them with a Linux/Quagga
router.  We max out at about 100kpps, as we're mostly pushing video which
gives us a large packet size.  It works fine, and I've been happy with it so
far.  But, we've gotten to the point where I want a backup router of some
sort in case something happens to that one, what with the fans and disks
that could fail.  I see a few options.

1. Just set up another Quagga box and use keepalived or some other HA
solution.
2. Buy a Cisco/Juniper/whatever and then have the Quagga box as backup.
3. I have a 6500 behind the router that's just doing switching.  Could I
have something switch that to static route all traffic to one of my
providers if something happened to the router?  The 6500 has Sup1A with
MSFC2 running IOS native.

On the Cisco side, I see that we could probably run a 7200VXR with NPE-G1
(about $6000 on ebay).  Moving to the Sup720, even used is probably out of
our price range.

What do you guys think I should use here?

Thanks,
Alex





Current thread: