nanog mailing list archives

Re: IP4 Space


From: Mark Newton <newton () internode com au>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:57:27 +1030


On 23/03/2010, at 3:43 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:

With the smaller routing table afforded by IPv6, this will be less expensive. As a result, I suspect there will be 
more IPv6 small multihomers.
That's generally a good thing.

Puzzled:  How does the IPv6 routing table get smaller?

There's currently social pressure against deaggregation, but given time
why do you think the same drivers that lead to v4 deaggregation won't also
lead to v6 deaggregation?

(small multihomers means more discontiguous blocks of PI space too, right?)

  - mark

--
Mark Newton                               Email:  newton () internode com au (W)
Network Engineer                          Email:  newton () atdot dotat org  (H)
Internode Pty Ltd                         Desk:   +61-8-82282999
"Network Man" - Anagram of "Mark Newton"  Mobile: +61-416-202-223







Current thread: