nanog mailing list archives

RE: NSP-SEC - should read Integrity


From: "Green, Tim R" <Tim.Green2 () mms gov>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 10:03:00 -0400

There are some out there......Infragard?....(shrugs shoulders)......

-----Original Message-----
From: bmanning () vacation karoshi com
[mailto:bmanning () vacation karoshi com] 
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 9:57 AM
To: William Pitcock
Cc: nanog () nanog org
Subject: Re: NSP-SEC - should read Integrity

On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 08:44:29AM -0500, William Pitcock wrote:
On Fri, 2010-03-19 at 08:31 -0500, John Kristoff wrote:
An ongoing area of work is to build better closed,
trusted communities without leaks. 

Have you ever considered that public transparency might not be a bad
thing?  This seems to be the plight of many security people, that they
have to be 100% secretive in everything they do, which is total
bullshit.

        
        I thnk I'd settle for operators with Integrity. those who do
what 
        they say. 

--bill



Current thread: