nanog mailing list archives
Re: Using private APNIC range in US
From: gordon b slater <gordslater () ieee org>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 06:37:33 +0000
On Fri, 2010-03-19 at 06:08 +0000, gordon b slater wrote:
It looks like chaos-squared out there. I don't envy anyone fathoming that stuff out for real.
clarification: `chaos` due to our ISP running internal boxes on the range in question, rather than external chaos. The implication being: if it's looping around inside the customers ISP then there's not much hope of easy troubleshooting, Gord -- sig nal generator
Current thread:
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US, (continued)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US William Allen Simpson (Mar 18)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Larry Sheldon (Mar 18)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Matt Shadbolt (Mar 18)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Charles Mills (Mar 19)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Craig Vuljanic (Mar 19)
- RE: Using private APNIC range in US Eric J Esslinger (Mar 19)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Graham Beneke (Mar 20)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Ćukasz Bromirski (Mar 20)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Daniel Senie (Mar 18)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US gordon b slater (Mar 18)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US gordon b slater (Mar 18)