nanog mailing list archives
Re: Using private APNIC range in US
From: William Allen Simpson <william.allen.simpson () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:30:39 -0400
On 3/18/10 2:35 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
Does anyone know if the University of Michigan or Cisco are going be updating their systems and documentation to no longer use 1.2.3.4 ? http://www.google.com/search?q=1.2.3.4+site%3Acisco.com I know that the University of Michigan utilize 1.2.3.4 for their captive portal login/logout pages as recently as monday when I was on the medical campus.
Dunno about cisco. med.umich.edu seems to run their own stuff, separately from umich.edu, and quite badly. I've complained about their setup repeatedly over the past several years. No traction. Should we try again, jointly? ;-)
Current thread:
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US, (continued)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Larry Sheldon (Mar 18)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Tom Ammon (Mar 18)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Mark Smith (Mar 21)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Joel Jaeggli (Mar 21)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Jonathan Lassoff (Mar 18)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Cian Brennan (Mar 18)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Owen DeLong (Mar 18)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Jared Mauch (Mar 18)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US William Allen Simpson (Mar 18)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Larry Sheldon (Mar 18)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Matt Shadbolt (Mar 18)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Charles Mills (Mar 19)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Craig Vuljanic (Mar 19)
- RE: Using private APNIC range in US Eric J Esslinger (Mar 19)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Graham Beneke (Mar 20)