nanog mailing list archives
Re: Network Naming Conventions
From: Rubens Kuhl <rubensk () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 20:43:17 -0300
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Paul Stewart <pstewart () nexicomgroup net> wrote:
Yeah, just learning that... got a *tonne* of offline replies. Planets won't work well, simpson characters we'll run out very quickly.... umm.. forgot the rest. We were looking for something that makes sense to the function of the box itself and scales up (as per some other folks point)....
With 726 episodes in 30 TV seasons and 11 feature films, it's very difficult to run out of Star Trek characters. Not main characters, though. Rubens
Current thread:
- Re: Network Naming Conventions, (continued)
- Re: Network Naming Conventions Roy (Mar 13)
- Re: Network Naming Conventions Larry Sheldon (Mar 13)
- Re: Network Naming Conventions ck (Mar 13)
- Re: Network Naming Conventions Barry Shein (Mar 13)
- RE: Network Naming Conventions Paul Stewart (Mar 13)
- Re: Network Naming Conventions Tom Wright (Mar 14)
- RE: Network Naming Conventions Erik L (Mar 13)
- Re: Network Naming Conventions bmanning (Mar 13)
- Re: Network Naming Conventions Ravi Pina (Mar 13)
- RE: Network Naming Conventions Paul Stewart (Mar 13)
- Re: Network Naming Conventions Rubens Kuhl (Mar 14)
- Re: Network Naming Conventions Joe Greco (Mar 14)
- RE: Network Naming Conventions Paul Stewart (Mar 15)
- RE: Network Naming Conventions Paul Stewart (Mar 13)
- Re: Network Naming Conventions gordon b slater (Mar 16)
- RE: Network Naming Conventions Erik Soosalu (Mar 16)