nanog mailing list archives
Re: Network Naming Conventions
From: Bryan Fields <Bryan () bryanfields net>
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 14:47:42 -0500
On 3/13/2010 10:47, Paul Stewart wrote:
Hi Folks... With many changes going on this year in our network, I figured it's a good time to revisit our naming conventions used in our networks.
I favor using CLLI code (well fake ones) TAMQFLTART1 is in the city of tampa (TAMQ) in FLorida at building TA, and RT1 is the first router there. This is nice as we know the location of the router, and building it's in from the host name. The host name is always 11 characters long, making it easy to filter/work with in logs. Now I alias the name in DNS so we can type "telnet tampa" and it will just be a CNAME pointing to TAMQFLTART1.keekles.org which is the loopback address. Interfaces are in DNS as well, and I make use of TXT records to store info on the hosts (mostly a contact number and a url to an internal wiki.) Below is an exerpt from a network policy I wrote about this: All network elements shall be named following CLLI code format. In most cases they will not be registered CLLI codes in CLONES. The format of a CLLI code is as follows CCCCSSTTEEE, i.e LTRKARHQR01 C – city location S – State postal code T – Street or differentiator E – Equipment Identifier In the event the equipment is being installed at a site with a registered CLLI site code (first 8 characters) this shall be used as the prefix. If not a company unique code will be used for the site CLLI. The equipment shall be identified using the following codes: RT[0-9] – router number n, with n starting at 0. If more than 10 routers at a site, the code will change to RU[0-9], then RV[0-9], and so on. SW[0-9] – Switch starting at 0 following the same progression as the router. P[00-99] – Servers at a location M[00-99] – Mux at a location R[00-99] – Radios TS[00-99] – terminal server (serial or other) VP[0-9] – VPN router or security appliance FW[0-9] – Firewall or packet filter I also tend to add funny names as CNAMES that are not published. Got to have some as the network designer after all ;-) -- Bryan Fields 727-409-1194 - Voice 727-214-2508 - Fax http://bryanfields.net
Current thread:
- RE: Network Naming Conventions, (continued)
- RE: Network Naming Conventions Paul Stewart (Mar 13)
- Re: Network Naming Conventions Tom Wright (Mar 14)
- RE: Network Naming Conventions Erik L (Mar 13)
- Re: Network Naming Conventions bmanning (Mar 13)
- Re: Network Naming Conventions Ravi Pina (Mar 13)
- RE: Network Naming Conventions Paul Stewart (Mar 13)
- Re: Network Naming Conventions Rubens Kuhl (Mar 14)
- Re: Network Naming Conventions Joe Greco (Mar 14)
- RE: Network Naming Conventions Paul Stewart (Mar 15)
- RE: Network Naming Conventions Paul Stewart (Mar 13)
- Re: Network Naming Conventions gordon b slater (Mar 16)
- RE: Network Naming Conventions Erik Soosalu (Mar 16)
- Re: Network Naming Conventions William F. Maton Sotomayor (Mar 13)