Re: IP4 Space

[Andy Davidson <andy () nosignal org>]

On 04/03/2010 19:30, William Herrin wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Joel Jaeggli <joelja () bogus com> wrote:
> > handling the v6 table is not currently hard (~2600 prefixes) while long
> > term the temptation to do TE is roughly that same in v6 as in v4, the
> > prospect of having a bunch of non-aggregatable direct assignments should
> > be much lower...
> Because we expect far fewer end users to multihome tomorrow than do today?

The opposite, but a clean slate means multihomed networks with many v4
prefixes may be able to be a multihomed network with just one v6 prefix.

Andy