nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP Update Report
From: Joe Provo <nanog-post () rsuc gweep net>
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 09:29:43 -0400
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 01:20:04AM -0400, Anton Kapela wrote:
So, this week, I actually read the update report. Noting the stats below (..a flap/update once per minute? please, fix your CPE router), I have but one humble request: Could the settlement-free members of the DFZ please consider re-enabling route-flap dampening towards customers?
The problem is that unless one is holding customer routes in a seperate VRF and dampen them there or take similar steps to segment, dampening leads directly to blackholes. Even in that case, failover within that VRF wouldn't work, as all implementations I've seen attack the prefix as the problem instead of the path vector. Bye-bye alternate paths. Cheers, Joe -- RSUC / GweepNet / Spunk / FnB / Usenix / SAGE
Current thread:
- BGP Update Report cidr-report (Mar 05)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- BGP Update Report cidr-report (Mar 12)
- BGP Update Report cidr-report (Mar 19)
- Re: BGP Update Report Anton Kapela (Mar 27)
- Re: BGP Update Report Joe Provo (Mar 28)
- Re: BGP Update Report Anton Kapela (Mar 28)
- Re: BGP Update Report Danny McPherson (Mar 28)
- Re: BGP Update Report Randy Bush (Mar 30)
- Re: BGP Update Report Danny McPherson (Mar 30)
- Re: BGP Update Report Anton Kapela (Mar 27)