nanog mailing list archives
Re: Internet Kill Switch.
From: Matthew Petach <mpetach () netflight com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 14:21:09 -0700
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 10:16 PM, Tom Wright <TWright () internode com au> wrote:
What ever happened to this? http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3271.txt -- Tom
Unfortunately, I think Vint was a little optimistic there, and failed to guess at the impact the financial collapse was going to have on our rate of innovation and progress: "By 2008 we should have a well-functioning Earth-Mars network that serves as a nascent backbone of an inter- planetary system of Internets - InterPlaNet is a network of Internets!" He also seemed to miss one of the really, REALLY important points; if "Internet is for everyone" were really true, then IPv6 adoption should have been one of his driving points. After all with a world population of 7 billion, you certainly can't have "Internet [...] for everyone" with only 4 billion IP addresses, unless you put a *lot* of NAT in place. But on the whole, other than being a bit dated at this point, it's still an inspiring read. Matt
Current thread:
- Internet Kill Switch. Larry Sheldon (Jun 17)
- Re: Internet Kill Switch. Larry Sheldon (Jun 17)
- Re: Internet Kill Switch. Franck Martin (Jun 17)
- Re: Internet Kill Switch. Tom Wright (Jun 17)
- Re: Internet Kill Switch. Larry Sheldon (Jun 17)
- Re: Internet Kill Switch. Peter Dambier (Jun 18)
- Re: Internet Kill Switch. James Jones (Jun 18)
- Re: Internet Kill Switch. Matthew Petach (Jun 18)
- Re: Internet Kill Switch. Zaid Ali (Jun 18)
- Re: Internet Kill Switch. Roland Perry (Jun 19)
- RE: Internet Kill Switch. Tomas L. Byrnes (Jun 19)
- Re: Internet Kill Switch. Larry Sheldon (Jun 19)
- Re: Internet Kill Switch. Mark Smith (Jun 19)
- Re: Internet Kill Switch. Larry Sheldon (Jun 17)