nanog mailing list archives
Re: Internet Kill Switch.
From: James Jones <james () freedomnet co nz>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 16:05:18 -0400
look like like they are trying to squeeze both ends. http://www.crn.com/networking/225700593;jsessionid=IR3YB1SGLW2BHQE1GHPSKH4ATMY32JVN On 18/07/10 1:25 AM, Larry Sheldon wrote:
On 6/18/2010 00:16, Tom Wright wrote:What ever happened to this? http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3271.txtEvery thing in that RFC from enabling freedom of speech to high volumes of untaxed dollars is anathema to the current administration. And yeah, that is politics and not BGP fine tuning. But if we don't take an interest in what they are doing, BGP isn't going to matter much. So, yes, this is a call to look at the layer 10 stuff a bit. If it isn't already too late. I've said my piece, moderators. Stand down.
Current thread:
- Internet Kill Switch. Larry Sheldon (Jun 17)
- Re: Internet Kill Switch. Larry Sheldon (Jun 17)
- Re: Internet Kill Switch. Franck Martin (Jun 17)
- Re: Internet Kill Switch. Tom Wright (Jun 17)
- Re: Internet Kill Switch. Larry Sheldon (Jun 17)
- Re: Internet Kill Switch. Peter Dambier (Jun 18)
- Re: Internet Kill Switch. James Jones (Jun 18)
- Re: Internet Kill Switch. Matthew Petach (Jun 18)
- Re: Internet Kill Switch. Zaid Ali (Jun 18)
- Re: Internet Kill Switch. Roland Perry (Jun 19)
- RE: Internet Kill Switch. Tomas L. Byrnes (Jun 19)
- Re: Internet Kill Switch. Larry Sheldon (Jun 19)
- Re: Internet Kill Switch. Mark Smith (Jun 19)
- Re: Internet Kill Switch. Larry Sheldon (Jun 17)