nanog mailing list archives

Re: Todd Underwood was a little late


From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 17:10:15 -0400

On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 12:38 AM, Roy <r.engehausen () gmail com> wrote:
On 6/16/2010 7:43 PM, Jon Lewis wrote:
 With a larger
network, multiple IP blocks, ***numerous multihomed customers***, some of which
use IP's we've assigned them, it gets a little more complicated to do.
I could reject at our border, packets sourced from our IP ranges with
exceptions for any of the IP blocks we've assigned to multihomed customers.

Sounds like a good use of URPF.

Reverse path filtering + asymmetric routing = epic fail. Jon did say
Multihomed customer.

Refer to RFC 3704 (BCP84). Note section 2.2 (Strict Reverse Path
Forwarding) last part of the final sentence: "in particular, when
applied to multihoming to different ISPs, this assumption may fail."

Regards,
Bill Herrin


-- 
William D. Herrin ................ herrin () dirtside com  bill () herrin us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004


Current thread: