nanog mailing list archives
Re: Todd Underwood was a little late
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 11:07:43 -0700
For those that missed the presentation, it was a real eye-opener on just how important it is for you to move forward with IPv6 before something like this actually starts getting implemented. Owen On Jun 17, 2010, at 10:31 AM, Todd Underwood wrote:
jon, all, i've received several questions about the context of this mail, so i thought it would be worth posting to clear up the reference. for those who missed it, i presented a lightning talk at nanog 49 in san francisco yesterday on some very early conceptual work on a really interesting strategy to dramatically extend the useful life of v4 prefixes. the talk is linked from: http://nanog.org/meetings/nanog49/agenda.php and i encourage people to take a look at it. if you like the general idea (Probabilistic Assignment of Prefixes: a System for Managing and Extending Address Resources is what some people are starting to call it), i'd encourage you to take the suggestion made at the mic by mark kosters, cto of arin, and work to help refine the proposal and establish a useful policy framework around its implementation. work is needed especially in collision domain modeling and count of resource implications for the operational overhead per prefix. experience with high flow rate instrumentation is likely to be needed in the near future as well. i wanted to thank everyone for the kind words and suggestions after the presentation and look forward to productively exploring this idea. cheers, todd underwood toddunder () gmail com
Current thread:
- Re: Todd Underwood was a little late, (continued)
- Re: Todd Underwood was a little late Brian Feeny (Jun 17)
- Re: Todd Underwood was a little late William Herrin (Jun 17)
- Re: Todd Underwood was a little late Steve Bertrand (Jun 18)
- Re: Todd Underwood was a little late Chris Adams (Jun 18)
- Re: Todd Underwood was a little late Steve Bertrand (Jun 18)
- Re: Todd Underwood was a little late William Herrin (Jun 18)
- Re: Todd Underwood was a little late Steve Bertrand (Jun 18)
- Re: Todd Underwood was a little late William Herrin (Jun 18)
- Re: Todd Underwood was a little late Owen DeLong (Jun 17)
- Re: Todd Underwood was a little late Frank Habicht (Jun 18)
- Re: Todd Underwood was a little late Christopher Morrow (Jun 17)
- Re: Todd Underwood was a little late Todd Underwood (Jun 17)
- RE: Todd Underwood was a little late Lee Howard (Jun 18)
- Re: Todd Underwood was a little late Michael Dillon (Jun 19)
- Re: Todd Underwood was a little late deleskie (Jun 19)
- Re: Todd Underwood was a little late bmanning (Jun 19)
- RE: Todd Underwood was a little late George Bonser (Jun 20)
- Country Level BGP Data Paul Stewart (Jun 28)
- Re: Country Level BGP Data Bill Woodcock (Jun 28)