nanog mailing list archives
Re: On the control of the Internet.
From: Bruce Williams <williams.bruce () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 18:13:54 -0700
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 6:42 AM, Joe Greco <jgreco () ns sol net> wrote:
Generally speaking, it will be treated as damage and routed around.That fable only really stands a chance when the damage is accidental; in the case where such "damage" is being deliberately inflicted, particularly by government, it gets more complicated. A lot of the 'net is a little more centralized than it ought to be in order to allow the "routed around" concept to work successfully. ... JG
BTW, I forget, when was the original ARPANET spec of surviving a nuclear war tested? I mean, we do know what would happen, right? Yes, Joe, the ARPANET fable does lives on. Bruce Williams
Current thread:
- On the control of the Internet. Larry Sheldon (Jun 12)
- Re: On the control of the Internet. Owen DeLong (Jun 13)
- Re: On the control of the Internet. Daniel (Jun 13)
- Re: On the control of the Internet. Joe Greco (Jun 13)
- Re: On the control of the Internet. Bruce Williams (Jun 13)
- Re: On the control of the Internet. Joel Jaeggli (Jun 13)
- Re: On the control of the Internet. Larry Sheldon (Jun 13)
- Re: On the control of the Internet. Owen DeLong (Jun 13)
- Re: On the control of the Internet. Larry Sheldon (Jun 13)
- Re: On the control of the Internet. Dave CROCKER (Jun 13)
- Re: On the control of the Internet. Larry Sheldon (Jun 13)
- Re: On the control of the Internet. Seth Mattinen (Jun 13)
- Re: On the control of the Internet. Eric Brunner-Williams (Jun 13)
- Re: On the control of the Internet. Joe Greco (Jun 13)
- Message not available
- Re: On the control of the Internet. Larry Sheldon (Jun 13)