nanog mailing list archives
Re: Addressing plan exercise for our IPv6 course
From: "Jordi Palet Martínez" <jordi.palet () consulintel es>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:38:50 +0200
The policies available in all the 5 RIR regions, allow you to request not the "default" /32, but whatever is appropriate for the size of your network even if you provide to your end-users /48. Not an issue. Regards, Jordi -----Original Message----- From: Matthew Walster <matthew () walster org> To: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> Cc: nanog () nanog org Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:00:40 +0100 Subject: Re: Addressing plan exercise for our IPv6 course On 29 July 2010 15:49, Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote:
If we give every household on the planet a /48 (approximately 3 billion
/48s), we consume less than 1/8192 of 2000::/3.
There are 65,536 /48s in a /32. It's not about how available 2000::/3 is, it's hassle to keep requesting additional PA space. Some ISPs literally have millions of customers. All I'm saying is, why waste the space when they're only going to need 1 subnet? If they want more than one subnet, give them a /48,/56,/60 or whatever, as requested. M ********************************************** The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.
Current thread:
- Re: Addressing plan exercise for our IPv6 course, (continued)
- Re: Addressing plan exercise for our IPv6 course Mark Smith (Jul 23)
- Re: Addressing plan exercise for our IPv6 course Fred Baker (Jul 23)
- Re: Addressing plan exercise for our IPv6 course Owen DeLong (Jul 24)
- Re: Addressing plan exercise for our IPv6 course Karl Auer (Jul 23)
- Re: Addressing plan exercise for our IPv6 course Marco Hogewoning (Jul 23)
- RE: Addressing plan exercise for our IPv6 course Lee Howard (Jul 23)
- Re: Addressing plan exercise for our IPv6 course Karl Auer (Jul 22)
- Re: Addressing plan exercise for our IPv6 course Matthew Walster (Jul 29)
- Re: Addressing plan exercise for our IPv6 course Owen DeLong (Jul 29)
- Re: Addressing plan exercise for our IPv6 course Matthew Walster (Jul 29)
- Re: Addressing plan exercise for our IPv6 course Jordi Palet Martínez (Jul 29)
- Re: Addressing plan exercise for our IPv6 course Leo Vegoda (Jul 29)
- Re: Addressing plan exercise for our IPv6 course Matthew Walster (Jul 30)
- Re: Addressing plan exercise for our IPv6 course Jeroen Massar (Jul 30)
- Re: Addressing plan exercise for our IPv6 course Matthew Walster (Jul 30)
- Re: Addressing plan exercise for our IPv6 course Owen DeLong (Jul 30)
- Re: Addressing plan exercise for our IPv6 course Leo Bicknell (Jul 30)
- Re: Addressing plan exercise for our IPv6 course David Conrad (Jul 30)
- Re: Addressing plan exercise for our IPv6 course Matthew Walster (Jul 30)
- Re: Addressing plan exercise for our IPv6 course Tore Anderson (Jul 30)
- Re: Addressing plan exercise for our IPv6 course Owen DeLong (Jul 30)