nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv4 Exhaustion...
From: "Ricky Beam" <jfbeam () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 16:30:07 -0400
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 17:43:39 -0400, Lee Howard <lee () asgard org> wrote:
RIAA should be IPv6 activists.
Right. That's not going to bite them on the ass either... privacy addresses only stick around for ~72hrs. A demand for an address from 3 months back would be impossible to answer. (that would require L2 tracking that an ISP simply cannot do.)
Current thread:
- IPv4 Exhaustion... Positively Optimistic (Jul 23)
- Re: IPv4 Exhaustion... David E. Smith (Jul 23)
- Re: IPv4 Exhaustion... William Herrin (Jul 23)
- RE: IPv4 Exhaustion... Lee Howard (Jul 23)
- Re: IPv4 Exhaustion... Ricky Beam (Jul 26)
- Re: IPv4 Exhaustion... Michael Thomas (Jul 26)
- Re: IPv4 Exhaustion... Ricky Beam (Jul 26)
- Re: IPv4 Exhaustion... nick hatch (Jul 23)
- Re: IPv4 Exhaustion... Barry Shein (Jul 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: IPv4 Exhaustion... khatfield (Jul 23)
- Re: IPv4 Exhaustion... Steven Bellovin (Jul 23)
- Re: IPv4 Exhaustion... Ricky Beam (Jul 23)
- Re: IPv4 Exhaustion... Leo Vegoda (Jul 23)
- Re: IPv4 Exhaustion... Owen DeLong (Jul 24)
- Re: IPv4 Exhaustion... Christopher Morrow (Jul 24)
- Re: IPv4 Exhaustion... Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 24)
- Re: IPv4 Exhaustion... Steven Bellovin (Jul 23)