nanog mailing list archives
RE: Using /31 for router links
From: Erik L <erik_list () caneris com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 14:33:12 -0500
As for ATM... The part that totally baffles me about the use of ATM on xDSL lines is that I have never, ever, ever seen an xDSL line carrying more than one ATM VC. OK, there may be someone out there who has set up a configuration like that just for fun, but 99.999% of all ATM'd xDSL lines out there carry a single PVC at 0*35 or 0*38.
Multi-PVC is used (in the context of xSLAM<-->CPE), for example, for delivering IPTV+DSL. 0/35 and 0/38 are just arbitrary numbers, there are plenty of other random ones like 0/33 used by major service providers. Arguably your "99.999%" is way off.
Current thread:
- Re: Using /31 for router links, (continued)
- Re: Using /31 for router links Richard A Steenbergen (Jan 22)
- Re: Using /31 for router links Tony Varriale (Jan 22)
- Re: Using /31 for router links Florian Weimer (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /31 for router links Tony Varriale (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /31 for router links Florian Weimer (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /31 for router links Jens Link (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /31 for router links Tony Varriale (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /31 for router links Michael Sokolov (Jan 22)
- Re: Using /31 for router links Mark Smith (Jan 22)
- Re: Using /31 for router links Stephen Sprunk (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /31 for router links Michael Sokolov (Jan 23)
- RE: Using /31 for router links Erik L (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /31 for router links Robert Glover (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /31 for router links Brielle Bruns (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /31 for router links Massimiliano Stucchi (Jan 25)
- Re: Using /31 for router links Ramanpreet Singh (Jan 25)
- RE: Using /31 for router links Frank Bulk (Jan 25)
- Re: Using /31 for router links Michael Sokolov (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /31 for router links Seth Mattinen (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /31 for router links Michael Sokolov (Jan 23)