nanog mailing list archives
Re: SORBS on autopilot?
From: Jed Smith <jed () jedsmith org>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 13:59:09 -0500
On Jan 12, 2010, at 1:48 PM, Dave Martin wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 11:51:47AM -0500, Jed Smith wrote:On Jan 11, 2010, at 11:11 AM, Jon Lewis wrote: The vibe I got from a number of administrators I talked to about it was "why would a standards document assume an IPv4/IPv6 unicast address is a residential customer with a modem, forcing those with allocations to prove that they are not residentially allocated rather than the other way around?"Because a default allow policy doesn't work in today's environment.
Blocking based on PTR alone is dangerous, is what I'm saying. I know default deny is important, but the decision can only be minorly influenced by PTR, not entirely made on it. There needs to be a better way, but there isn't. JS
Current thread:
- Re: SORBS on autopilot?, (continued)
- Re: SORBS on autopilot? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 12)
- Re: SORBS on autopilot? Steven Champeon (Jan 12)
- Re: SORBS on autopilot? Jed Smith (Jan 12)
- Re: SORBS on autopilot? Brian Keefer (Jan 12)
- Re: SORBS on autopilot? Rich Kulawiec (Jan 12)
- Re: SORBS on autopilot? Brian Keefer (Jan 13)
- Re: SORBS on autopilot? JC Dill (Jan 12)
- Re: SORBS on autopilot? Ricky Beam (Jan 14)
- Re: SORBS on autopilot? Steven Champeon (Jan 12)
- Re: SORBS on autopilot? Dave Martin (Jan 12)
- Re: SORBS on autopilot? Jed Smith (Jan 12)
- Re: SORBS on autopilot? Michael Thomas (Jan 12)
- Re: SORBS on autopilot? Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 12)
- Re: SORBS on autopilot? Michael Thomas (Jan 12)
- Re: Identifying residential CPE IP addresses? (was: SORBS on autopilot?) Jed Smith (Jan 12)
- Re: Identifying residential CPE IP addresses? (was: SORBS on autopilot?) Steven Champeon (Jan 12)
- Re: SORBS on autopilot? Dave Martin (Jan 12)
- Re: SORBS on autopilot? Rich Kulawiec (Jan 13)
- Re: SORBS on autopilot? Brian Keefer (Jan 12)
- Re: SORBS on autopilot? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 12)