nanog mailing list archives
Re: more inane confidentiality notices, was he.net down/slow?
From: "John R. Levine" <johnl () iecc com>
Date: 10 Jan 2010 00:50:16 -0500
The point is that rather than try to enforce agreements individually, automatically slapping the notices on is not so unreasonable all considered. While it may be annoying, its not baseless. It certaintly isn't useless in discovery.
Once again, I would be most interested in any statute or case law to support this claim. I've been involved in a lot of discovery in a lot of cases over the years, and I cannot remember a single instance where a boilerplate confidentiality notice was even noted, much less enforced.
As I said:
In reality, boilerplate confidentiality notices merely document the fact that a mail system is in the grip of the clueless and/or confused.
R's, John
Current thread:
- he.net down/slow? Brian Johnson (Jan 07)
- Re: he.net down/slow? Brad Fleming (Jan 07)
- Re: he.net down/slow? William Pitcock (Jan 07)
- Re: he.net down/slow? Fearghas McKay (Jan 07)
- RE: he.net down/slow? Brian Johnson (Jan 07)
- Re: he.net down/slow? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 07)
- Re: he.net down/slow? Dave Martin (Jan 08)
- Re: he.net down/slow? Martin Hannigan (Jan 09)
- Re: more inane confidentiality notices, was he.net down/slow? John Levine (Jan 09)
- Re: more inane confidentiality notices, was he.net down/slow? Martin Hannigan (Jan 09)
- Re: more inane confidentiality notices, was he.net down/slow? John R. Levine (Jan 09)
- Re: he.net down/slow? Fearghas McKay (Jan 07)
- Re: he.net down/slow? joel jaeggli (Jan 09)
- Re: he.net down/slow? Martin Hannigan (Jan 09)
- Re: he.net down/slow? James Hess (Jan 09)
- Re: he.net down/slow? goemon (Jan 09)
- Re: he.net down/slow? Joe Greco (Jan 10)
- Re: he.net down/slow? JC Dill (Jan 10)
- Re: he.net down/slow? William Herrin (Jan 09)
- Re: he.net down/slow? Joe Greco (Jan 10)
- Re: he.net down/slow? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 10)
- Re: he.net down/slow? Joe Greco (Jan 10)