Re: ASR1002

[Kenny Sallee <kenny.sallee () gmail com>]

> From my research - I'd have to agree.  There is VRF aware NAT that I may
need in 2.5 - however I shouldn't need it right away.  Perhaps give 2.5 a
chance to mature a little. Thanks for the feedback.
Kenny

On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 7:08 PM, McDonald Richards <
mcdonald.richards () gmail com> wrote:

> I'd recommend 2.4.x (XNDx) unless you REALLY need the BGP PIC features in
> 2.5. 2.4 was the first release to support L2VPNs and should be mature
> enough
> in it's general support of MPLS/VRFs. 2.5 is still VERY new and was only
> released publicly in December.
>
> 2.4.2 still has a few bugs but for the features you've listed above, should
> be stable enough. After running it since it's release (2.3.2 previously)
> I've not seen a software crash on any of our ASR1Ks. I run a mix of RP1 and
> RP2 devices and since this an ASR1002 you'll be after the RP1 code.
>
> McDonald
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Jared Mauch <jared () puck nether net>
> wrote:
>
> > I would run at least the 2.5 software (XNE).
> >
> > You don't mention if you have RP1 or RP2, if you're doing sw redundancy
> or
> > hw redundancy or both, etc.. This will also have an impact.
> >
> > I've seen some 'odd' issues with BGP on the ASR1k, so you really do want
> to
> > track the latest code.  It's also recommended to keep a close eye on your
> > memory utilization and if/when any cores show up on the harddisk(s).
> >
> > - Jared
> >
> > On Jan 6, 2010, at 7:36 PM, Kenny Sallee wrote:
> >
> > > Anyone have recommendations on solid IOS XE code for ASR 1002 that's
> just
> > > doing:
> > >
> > > - BGP
> > > - VRF's
> > > - Many sub-interfaces and ACL's
> > >
> > > It shipped with 02.04.02.122-33.XND2.bin
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Kenny