nanog mailing list archives

Re: "Cyber Shockwave" on CNN


From: Cian Brennan <cian.brennan () redbrick dcu ie>
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 14:09:26 +0000

On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 07:49:25PM -0800, Tomas L. Byrnes wrote:
Right, because GCHQ doesn't/hasn't/never would do such a thing...

At least the US has a written constitution and the concept of the people being sovereign.

I'll take that over trusting "Her Majesty's..." whatever.

But then again, I'm Irish, so I have a bit more direct personal and familial experience of the darker side of British 
"civilization". (EG: While detention without trial is relatively NEW in the US, it's been a fact of life in the UK 
for most of its history).

And in Ireland too.


-----Original Message-----
From: andrew.wallace [mailto:andrew.wallace () rocketmail com]
Sent: Saturday, February 20, 2010 2:13 PM
To: Randy Bush
Cc: nanog () nanog org
Subject: Re: "Cyber Shockwave" on CNN

--- On Sat, 20/2/10, Randy Bush <randy () psg com> wrote:

From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Subject: Re: "Cyber Shockwave" on CNN
To: "andrew.wallace" <andrew.wallace () rocketmail com>
Cc: nanog () nanog org
Date: Saturday, 20 February, 2010, 21:58
It looks like this demo is

a bunch of sick press and sick ex-gov wishtheycouldbeagains
trying to
get as much mindshare as they can.  and you're helping
them.

randy


I refuse to let you say I am helping them -- I am from UK, I don't
agree with them wanting to allow The NSA to take over private sector
networks or citizens smart phones 'in an emergency'.

Andrew







-- 

-- 


Current thread: