nanog mailing list archives
Re: Default route with object tracking
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 11:26:23 -0500
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Curtis Maurand <cmaurand () xyonet com> wrote:
I'd rather send him to something more open like kernel.org; anything but Google's DNS. Google's DNS is a little too nefarious for my taste.
<tinfoil hat off> nefarious? as a route object to track for selection of a default route? really? </tinfoil hat off> I think watching something 'very stable' like.... 198.6.0.0/16 may be useful, but in the end "pick some route that's long lived and not in just your upstream's control', that you see via both upstreams." seems like the best option. -chris
Current thread:
- Default route with object tracking Andrey Gordon (Feb 01)
- Re: Default route with object tracking Dan White (Feb 01)
- Re: Default route with object tracking Curtis Maurand (Feb 01)
- RE: Default route with object tracking Stefan Fouant (Feb 01)
- Re: Default route with object tracking Andrey Gordon (Feb 01)
- Re: Default route with object tracking Christopher Morrow (Feb 01)
- Re: Default route with object tracking Steven Bellovin (Feb 01)
- Re: Default route with object tracking Curtis Maurand (Feb 01)
- Re: Default route with object tracking Scott Morris (Feb 01)
- Re: Default route with object tracking Dan White (Feb 01)