nanog mailing list archives
Re: History of 4.2.2.2. What's the story?
From: Scott Howard <scott () doc net au>
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 14:46:08 -0800
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Mark Andrews <marka () isc org> wrote:
I don't care what internal routing tricks are used, they are still under the *one* external route and as such subject to single points of failure and as such don't have enough independence.
Where has Level 3 ever claimed that these servers were ever for *external* use? As a Level 3 customer who uses these servers, I'm seeing multiple *internal* routes to these servers. Of course, if 4/8 disappears from the global routing tables then Level 3 has a bit bigger problem than their DNS resolvers not being accessible from non-customers. I'd also be interested in knowing where you consider the "single points of failure" for their announcement of 4/8 is, but that's probably for another thread... Scott.
Current thread:
- RE: History of 4.2.2.2. What's the story?, (continued)
- RE: History of 4.2.2.2. What's the story? Frank Bulk (Feb 16)
- Re: History of 4.2.2.2. What's the story? Joe Abley (Feb 16)
- Re: History of 4.2.2.2. What's the story? Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 17)
- RE: History of 4.2.2.2. What's the story? Tomas L. Byrnes (Feb 17)
- Re: History of 4.2.2.2. What's the story? Nick Hilliard (Feb 17)
- RE: History of 4.2.2.2. What's the story? Tomas L. Byrnes (Feb 17)
- Re: History of 4.2.2.2. What's the story? Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 17)
- RE: History of 4.2.2.2. What's the story? Tomas L. Byrnes (Feb 17)
- RE: History of 4.2.2.2. What's the story? Tomas L. Byrnes (Feb 16)
- RE: History of 4.2.2.2. What's the story? Frank Bulk (Feb 16)
- Re: History of 4.2.2.2. What's the story? Scott Howard (Feb 14)
- Re: History of 4.2.2.2. What's the story? Mark Andrews (Feb 14)
- Re: History of 4.2.2.2. What's the story? Sean Reifschneider (Feb 14)
- Re: History of 4.2.2.2. What's the story? Scott Howard (Feb 14)