nanog mailing list archives

Re: Email Portability Approved by Knesset Committee


From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 08:42:33 -0800


On Feb 23, 2010, at 8:34 AM, N. Yaakov Ziskind wrote:

Larry Sheldon wrote (on Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:28:03AM -0600):
On 2/23/2010 4:39 AM, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:

Maybe politicians should just keep their nose out of things that they
can't understand.  Email addresses aren't phone numbers.

It occurs to me that maybe there is a reason why political conservatives
get so excited about "minor, trivial" erosions of sanity; why they worry
about "where this might lead"....

It's been mentioned--why not "portable" street addresses.  Fire
departments will just have to adapt.

If you want an example of just what would result, take a trip to Tokyo,
where house numbers were assigned in the order that building permits
were issued, and you need *extremely* detailed directions.

Seoul is a good example of this as well, but, no-one is even sure that
building age is actually determinant in Seoul. Most of the Koreans I
was working with swear that addresses are assigned by a random
number generator without duplicate detection.

Owen



Current thread: