nanog mailing list archives
Re: Blocking International DNS
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 10:53:10 +0900
the more i think about this, the more i am inclined to consider a second trusted root not (easily) attackable by the usg, who owns the root now, or the acta vigilantes. as dissent becomes less tolerated, let alone supported, we may want to attempt to ensure it in our deployments.Wouldn't this simply change the focus of who can attack from the USG (which, as far as I am aware, has not attacked the root)
see smb's url re rightsholders having alleged bad sites blocked. randy
Current thread:
- Re: Blocking International DNS Randy Bush (Dec 01)
- Re: Blocking International DNS Leen Besselink (Dec 01)
- Re: Blocking International DNS Jorge Amodio (Dec 01)
- Re: Blocking International DNS Michael Painter (Dec 01)
- Re: Blocking International DNS David Conrad (Dec 01)
- Re: Blocking International DNS Steven Bellovin (Dec 01)
- Re: Blocking International DNS David Conrad (Dec 01)
- Re: Blocking International DNS Randy Bush (Dec 01)
- Re: Blocking International DNS Steven Bellovin (Dec 01)
- Re: Blocking International DNS Marshall Eubanks (Dec 01)
- Re: Blocking International DNS Randy Bush (Dec 01)
- Re: Blocking International DNS Randy Bush (Dec 01)
- Re: Blocking International DNS Jorge Amodio (Dec 01)
- Re: Blocking International DNS Dobbins, Roland (Dec 01)
- Re: Blocking International DNS Randy Bush (Dec 01)
- Re: Blocking International DNS Jorge Amodio (Dec 01)
- Re: Blocking International DNS Lyndon Nerenberg (VE6BBM/VE7TFX) (Dec 01)
- Re: Blocking International DNS Jeff Johnstone (Dec 01)
- Re: Blocking International DNS Mark Andrews (Dec 01)
- Re: Blocking International DNS Lamar Owen (Dec 02)
- Re: Blocking International DNS Leen Besselink (Dec 01)