nanog mailing list archives
Re: Lightning Debates at NANOG 51
From: Jac Kloots <Jac.Kloots () SURFnet nl>
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 22:39:27 +0100 (CET)
On Tue, 7 Dec 2010, Owen DeLong wrote:
Ethernet: 40GE vs. 100GEROFL
Even more interesting is the 100GE Optics debate. Standardized (expensive and very scarce) 100GBASE-LR4 vs non-standard but cheaper and easier to manufacture LR10 (based on 10x 10Gbit/s on a very narrow DWDM-grid)..
Jac -- Jac Kloots Network Services SURFnet bv
Current thread:
- Lightning Debates at NANOG 51 Tom Daly (Dec 07)
- Re: Lightning Debates at NANOG 51 Owen DeLong (Dec 07)
- Re: Lightning Debates at NANOG 51 Jac Kloots (Dec 07)
- Re: Lightning Debates at NANOG 51 Greg Whynott (Dec 07)
- Re: Lightning Debates at NANOG 51 Tom Daly (Dec 07)
- RE: Lightning Debates at NANOG 51 George Bonser (Dec 07)
- Re: Lightning Debates at NANOG 51 Tom Daly (Dec 07)
- RE: Lightning Debates at NANOG 51 George Bonser (Dec 07)
- Re: Lightning Debates at NANOG 51 Tom Daly (Dec 07)
- Re: Lightning Debates at NANOG 51 Greg Whynott (Dec 07)
- Re: Lightning Debates at NANOG 51 Tom Daly (Dec 07)
- Re: Lightning Debates at NANOG 51 Owen DeLong (Dec 07)
- Re: Lightning Debates at NANOG 51 John Kristoff (Dec 07)
- Re: Lightning Debates at NANOG 51 Christian Pena (Dec 07)