nanog mailing list archives
Re: Abuse@ contacts
From: Jason Bertoch <jason () i6ix com>
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 12:32:30 -0500
On 2010/12/07 11:39 AM, Gavin Pearce wrote:
How many of you (honestly) actively manage and respond to abuse@ contact details listed in WHOIS? Or have had any luck with abuse@ contacts in the past? Who's good and who isn't?
I answer our abuse@ address and file reports daily. I get automated responses from the free providers, but have little faith they care enough to fix the problem. RIPE regions seem to process reports with an attitude that they care, while LACNIC, AFRINIC, and Asian providers seem to ignore all reports if you can even find a working abuse@ contact. Smaller providers in the ARIN region also seem to do a good job.
-- /Jason
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Current thread:
- Abuse@ contacts Gavin Pearce (Dec 07)
- Re: Abuse@ contacts Simon Waters (Dec 07)
- Re: Abuse@ contacts Daniel Seagraves (Dec 07)
- Re: Abuse@ contacts Wayne Lee (Dec 07)
- Re: Abuse@ contacts Jason Bertoch (Dec 07)
- Re: Abuse@ contacts Rich Kulawiec (Dec 07)
- Re: Abuse@ contacts Joe Greco (Dec 07)
- Re: Abuse@ contacts Christopher Morrow (Dec 07)
- Re: Abuse@ contacts Shaun Ewing (Dec 07)
- Re: Abuse@ contacts Suresh Ramasubramanian (Dec 07)