nanog mailing list archives

Re: "Unlimited" wireless data...


From: "Jason J. W. Williams" <williamsjj () digitar com>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 19:01:41 -0500

I would second Nathan's experience. Tried to use them for our corporate office as a life boat when our T1 provider was 
sold to an outfit that didn't answer the support lines. Clear's NAT is atrocious and can't be turned off, so you can't 
drop a real firewall behind it on a single static. 

-J
--------
Jason J. W. Williams, COO/CTO
DigiTar
williamsjj () digitar com

V: 208.343.8520
F: 208.322.8522
M: 208.863.0727

www.digitar.com

On Dec 3, 2010, at 4:47 PM, Nathan Eisenberg wrote:


This came up in another thread yesterday or today, and I just got the
solicitation mailer for Clearwire's WiMAX service in Tampa Bay, which they
call "4G", though the ITU disagrees.

The AUP is here: http://www.clear.com/legal/aup

I cannot strongly enough discourage you from using their service.  My experience with them has been consistently 
awful - and given that they're headquartered in my area, that's unacceptable.  I'm informed that my experience is not 
at all unique - either to the Seattle area or to their service at large.  Their Wikipedia article tells you pretty 
much everything you need to know.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clearwire

Their definition of unlimited tends to be "barely acceptable throughput levels, until you start streaming 
youtube/netflix or doing a long-running download or using bittorrent to seed files to your work PC and laptop or 
using your VPN to retrieve a document, in which case, we won't turn you off, we'll just silently jail you into a 
32-128kbps bandwidth profile.   Also, have some poorly implemented NAT on our ludicrously underpowered CPEs!"

I also understand that they've been having financial difficulties, so they're unlikely to address the issues their 
customers are faced with.

If I were you, I would keep your backpack offline until another option is available.  You're not going to be able to 
use VOIP on their service, anyways.

Nathan
(Speaking as an individual - not as the company I work for.)

!SIG:4cf9826a241136755510774!




Current thread: