nanog mailing list archives

Re: .gov DNSSEC operational message

From: Tony Finch <dot () dotat at>
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 15:01:41 +0000

On 29 Dec 2010, at 03:27, Jay Ashworth <jra () baylink com> wrote:


If you do not, then your clients have little hope of spotting insider malfeasance changes, no?


No cryptography can expose the difference between data that is correctly signed by the proper procedures and data that 
is correctly signed by a corrupt procedure.

Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot () dotat at>  http://dotat.at/

Current thread:

.gov DNSSEC operational message Matt Larson (Dec 22)
- Re: .gov DNSSEC operational message Jay Ashworth (Dec 23)
  - Re: .gov DNSSEC operational message Matt Larson (Dec 26)
    - Re: .gov DNSSEC operational message Doug Barton (Dec 28)
    - Re: .gov DNSSEC operational message - picking a fight bmanning (Dec 28)
    - Re: .gov DNSSEC operational message - picking a fight Doug Barton (Dec 28)
    - Re: .gov DNSSEC operational message - picking a fight Tony Finch (Dec 29)
    - Re: .gov DNSSEC operational message - picking a fight bmanning (Dec 29)
    - Re: .gov DNSSEC operational message Jay Ashworth (Dec 28)
    - Re: .gov DNSSEC operational message Robert E. Seastrom (Dec 29)
    - Re: .gov DNSSEC operational message Tony Finch (Dec 29)
    - Re: .gov DNSSEC operational message Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 29)
    - Re: .gov DNSSEC operational message bmanning (Dec 29)
    - Re: .gov DNSSEC operational message Tony Finch (Dec 30)
    - Re: .gov DNSSEC operational message Jay Ashworth (Dec 30)
    - Re: .gov DNSSEC operational message Jay Ashworth (Dec 28)
  - Re: .gov DNSSEC operational message Florian Weimer (Dec 26)
    - Re: .gov DNSSEC operational message jamie rishaw (Dec 27)
    - Re: .gov DNSSEC operational message Jay Ashworth (Dec 28)
    - Re: .gov DNSSEC operational message Kevin Oberman (Dec 28)
    - Re: .gov DNSSEC operational message Jay Ashworth (Dec 28)

(Thread continues...)