nanog mailing list archives
Re: "potential new and different architectural approach" to solve the
From: Benson Schliesser <bensons () queuefull net>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 11:28:09 -0600
On Dec 17, 2010, at 11:23 AM, Joe Greco wrote:
How effective have variations on hot potato routing been, historically? I seem to recall Cogent made lots of noises early on about how they could do hot potato routing to encourage peering, but over the years that didn't seem to pan out that way.
I can't comment on Cogent... But, in general: hot-potato reduces network costs but doesn't eliminate them--more capacity is still required to carry more traffic. The goal is to balance out the cost, assuming the traffic is of adequate value (or equal value, ideally) to both networks. Cheers, -Benson
Current thread:
- "potential new and different architectural approach" to solve the Comcast - L3 dispute LorĂ¡nd Jakab (Dec 17)
- Re: "potential new and different architectural approach" to solve the Comcast - L3 dispute Benson Schliesser (Dec 17)
- Re: "potential new and different architectural approach" to solve the Joe Greco (Dec 17)
- Re: "potential new and different architectural approach" to solve the Benson Schliesser (Dec 17)
- Re: "potential new and different architectural approach" to solve the Comcast - L3 dispute Jeff Wheeler (Dec 17)
- RE: "potential new and different architectural approach" to solve theComcast - L3 dispute George Bonser (Dec 17)
- Re: "potential new and different architectural approach" to solve theComcast - L3 dispute Lamar Owen (Dec 17)
- Re: "potential new and different architectural approach" to solve theComcast - L3 dispute Jack Bates (Dec 17)
- RE: "potential new and different architectural approach" to solve theComcast - L3 dispute david raistrick (Dec 17)
- Re: "potential new and different architectural approach" to solve theComcast - L3 dispute Marshall Eubanks (Dec 17)
- Re: "potential new and different architectural approach" to solve the Joe Greco (Dec 17)
- Re: "potential new and different architectural approach" to solve the Comcast - L3 dispute Benson Schliesser (Dec 17)
- Re: "potential new and different architectural approach" to solve the Comcast - L3 dispute Benson Schliesser (Dec 17)
- Re: "potential new and different architectural approach" to solve the Comcast - L3 dispute Steve Schultze (Dec 17)
- Re: "potential new and different architectural approach" to solve the Comcast - L3 dispute Joly MacFie (Dec 17)
- Re: "potential new and different architectural approach" to solve the Comcast - L3 dispute Steve Schultze (Dec 17)