nanog mailing list archives
Re: BCP38 exceptions for RFC1918 space
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 03:05:04 +0900
What's the current consensus on exempting private network space from source address validation? Is it recommended? Discouraged? (One argument in favor of exceptions is that it makes PMTUD work if transfer networks use private address space.)
and this is a good thing? rfc1918 packets are not supposed to reach the public internet. once you start accommodating their doing so, the downward slope gets pretty steep and does not end in a nice place. randy
Current thread:
- Re: BCP38 exceptions for RFC1918 space, (continued)
- Re: BCP38 exceptions for RFC1918 space Adam Armstrong (Aug 15)
- Re: BCP38 exceptions for RFC1918 space Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 16)
- Re: BCP38 exceptions for RFC1918 space Joe Greco (Aug 16)
- Re: BCP38 exceptions for RFC1918 space Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 16)
- RE: BCP38 exceptions for RFC1918 space Leigh Porter (Aug 23)
- Re: BCP38 exceptions for RFC1918 space Ali (Aug 23)
- Re: BCP38 exceptions for RFC1918 space Joel Jaeggli (Aug 23)
- RE: BCP38 exceptions for RFC1918 space Leigh Porter (Aug 23)
- Re: BCP38 exceptions for RFC1918 space Florian Weimer (Aug 15)
- Re: BCP38 exceptions for RFC1918 space Marco Hogewoning (Aug 15)
- Re: BCP38 exceptions for RFC1918 space William Herrin (Aug 15)