nanog mailing list archives
Re: BCP38 exceptions for RFC1918 space
From: Michael J Wise <mjwise () kapu net>
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 09:47:35 -0700
On Aug 15, 2010, at 9:14 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
What's the current consensus on exempting private network space from source address validation?
BCP38-land MUST *never* see RFC1918-space traffic. Ever. Unless you're using a border router as a NAT device, of course.... The only way your question makes sense is if someone who should know better is intending to announce some chunk of RFC1918-space via BGP. Please tell us that is not your intent. Aloha, Michael. -- "Please have your Internet License http://kapu.net/~mjwise/ and Usenet Registration handy..."
Current thread:
- Re: BCP38 exceptions for RFC1918 space, (continued)
- Re: BCP38 exceptions for RFC1918 space Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 15)
- Re: BCP38 exceptions for RFC1918 space Florian Weimer (Aug 15)
- Re: BCP38 exceptions for RFC1918 space Adam Armstrong (Aug 15)
- Re: BCP38 exceptions for RFC1918 space Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 16)
- Re: BCP38 exceptions for RFC1918 space Joe Greco (Aug 16)
- Re: BCP38 exceptions for RFC1918 space Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 16)
- RE: BCP38 exceptions for RFC1918 space Leigh Porter (Aug 23)
- Re: BCP38 exceptions for RFC1918 space Ali (Aug 23)
- Re: BCP38 exceptions for RFC1918 space Joel Jaeggli (Aug 23)
- RE: BCP38 exceptions for RFC1918 space Leigh Porter (Aug 23)
- Re: BCP38 exceptions for RFC1918 space Florian Weimer (Aug 15)
- Re: BCP38 exceptions for RFC1918 space Marco Hogewoning (Aug 15)
- Re: BCP38 exceptions for RFC1918 space William Herrin (Aug 15)