nanog mailing list archives
RE: Lightly used IP addresses
From: "Frank Bulk" <frnkblk () iname com>
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 21:34:28 -0500
This week I was told by my sales person at Red Condor that I'm the only one of his customers that is asking for IPv6. He sounded annoyed and it seemed like he was trying to make me feel bad for being the "only oddball" pushing the IPv6 feature requirement. I tried to explain to him that by this time next year IANA will likely have handed out all their IPv4 blocks and that I didn't have the time spend the first half of 2011 implementing IPv6 across my $DAYJOB network, but wanted to spread that work over time. To his credit, it's been on their to-do list for at least 6 months if not a year, it's just been pushed back several quarters. Frank -----Original Message----- From: Owen DeLong [mailto:owen () delong com] Sent: Saturday, August 14, 2010 10:27 AM To: Jeffrey Lyon Cc: John Curran; nanog () nanog org; Ken Chase Subject: Re: Lightly used IP addresses On Aug 13, 2010, at 9:12 PM, Jeffrey Lyon wrote:
John et al, I have read many of your articles about the need to migrate to IPv6 and how failure to do so will impact business continuity sometime in the next 1 - 3 years. I've pressed our vendors to support IPv6 (note: keep in mind we're a DDoS mitigation firm, our needs extend beyond routers and switches) and found that it's a chicken and egg situation. Vendors are neglecting to support IPv6 because there is "no demand." I've pointed out your articles and demanded IPv6 support, some are promising results in the next several months. We will see.
I was at a trade show several months back. I watched a series of people walk up to a vendor and each, in turn, asked about IPv6 support. The vendor told each, in turn, "You're the only one asking for it." I walked up to the vendor and took my turn being told "You're the only one asking for it." I pointed out that I had seen the other people get the same answer. The sales person admitted he was caught red handed and explained "We're working on it, but, we don't have a definite date and so our marketing department has told us to downplay the demand and the importance until we have something more definitive." <snip> Owen
Current thread:
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses, (continued)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses John Curran (Aug 13)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses Jeffrey Lyon (Aug 13)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses John Curran (Aug 13)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses David Conrad (Aug 13)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses Randy Bush (Aug 13)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses Jeffrey Lyon (Aug 13)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses Randy Bush (Aug 13)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses Owen DeLong (Aug 14)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses Bret Clark (Aug 14)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses Owen DeLong (Aug 14)
- RE: Lightly used IP addresses Frank Bulk (Aug 14)
- RE: Lightly used IP addresses John Springer (Aug 16)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses Dan White (Aug 16)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses Randy Bush (Aug 13)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses John Curran (Aug 13)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses Randy Bush (Aug 13)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses John Curran (Aug 13)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses Randy Bush (Aug 13)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses John Curran (Aug 13)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses Randy Bush (Aug 13)