nanog mailing list archives
Re: Lightly used IP addresses
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 16:16:31 -0700
On Aug 13, 2010, at 11:31 AM, Ken Chase wrote:
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 02:15:51PM -0400, John R. Levine said:I don't entirely understand the process. Here's the flow chart as far as I've figured it out: 1. A sells a /20 of IPv4 space to B for, say, $5,000 2. A tells ARIN to transfer the chunk to B 3. ARIN says no, B hasn't shown that they need it 4. A and B say screw it, and B announces the space anyway 5. ???6. ARIN receives a fraud/abuse complaint that A's space is being used by B. 7. ARIN discovers that A is no longer using the space in accordance with their RSA 8. ARIN reclaims the space and A and B are left to figure out who owes what to whom.9. A and B ignore ARIN's email and continue to announce what they've been announcing. 10. ARIN attempts to allocate the /20 to someone else, who is not amused. Note that at this point ARIN presumably has no more v4 space left, so a threat never to allocate more space to A or B isn't very scary. Given its limited practical leverage, ARIN is only effective insofar as its members and customers agree that playing by ARIN's rules is more beneficial than ignoring them.Right, and Im answering my own question here, for (8) about the reclaiming - what upstream is going to stop carrying prefixes from a downstream that's 'illegally' announcing them? Is this upstream going to cut that customer off and lose the revenue, just to satisfy ARIN's bleating? From what I gather, all that ARIN can do is remove the NS records for the i-a.a reverse zone for the offending block, making SMTP a little trickier from the block, but not much else.
ARIN can do quite a bit more if the resources are under RSA. If they are legacy resources (which I don't believe there are such things as legacy /20s), then, it's a bit murkier, but, I wouldn't completely count ARIN out.
Unless I didnt see the other large sticks ARIN's carrying? I've never seen them send hired goons to anyone's door... yet?
Contract law anyone? Perhaps you should re-read your RSAs. Owen
Current thread:
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses, (continued)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses Chris Grundemann (Aug 14)
- RE: Lightly used IP addresses Greg Whynott (Aug 13)
- RE: Lightly used IP addresses Nathan Eisenberg (Aug 13)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses David Conrad (Aug 13)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses Ken Chase (Aug 13)
- RE: Lightly used IP addresses Frank Bulk (Aug 14)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses Randy Bush (Aug 14)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses John Curran (Aug 13)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses Ken Chase (Aug 13)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 13)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses Owen DeLong (Aug 13)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses John Curran (Aug 13)
- Message not available
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses John Curran (Aug 13)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses bmanning (Aug 13)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses John Curran (Aug 13)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses bmanning (Aug 13)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses Ken Chase (Aug 13)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses John Curran (Aug 13)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses Jeffrey Lyon (Aug 13)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses John Curran (Aug 13)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses Jeffrey Lyon (Aug 13)