nanog mailing list archives
Re: net-neutrality
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 17:20:23 +0530
Not that I am speaking for anybody but myself here. I'll killfile this thread now On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Raymond Dijkxhoorn <raymond () prolocation net> wrote:
btw, considering that you appearantly run a larger network than the 3 networks we own and operate, willing to sell? :PThat would be rarther funny Sven, you buying IBM. Sweet dreams.
-- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists () gmail com)
Current thread:
- Re: net-neutrality, (continued)
- Re: net-neutrality Mark Smith (Aug 11)
- Re: net-neutrality Sven Olaf Kamphuis (Aug 11)
- Re: net-neutrality William Pitcock (Aug 11)
- Re: net-neutrality Sven Olaf Kamphuis (Aug 11)
- Re: net-neutrality Sven Olaf Kamphuis (Aug 11)
- Re: net-neutrality Suresh Ramasubramanian (Aug 11)
- Re: net-neutrality Sven Olaf Kamphuis (Aug 11)
- Re: net-neutrality Suresh Ramasubramanian (Aug 11)
- Re: net-neutrality Sven Olaf Kamphuis (Aug 11)
- Re: net-neutrality Sven Olaf Kamphuis (Aug 11)
- Re: net-neutrality Raymond Dijkxhoorn (Aug 11)
- Re: net-neutrality Suresh Ramasubramanian (Aug 11)
- Re: net-neutrality Sven Olaf Kamphuis (Aug 11)
- Re: net-neutrality Mark Smith (Aug 11)
- Re: net-neutrality William Pitcock (Aug 11)
- Re: net-neutrality Chris Fuenty (Aug 11)
- Re: RE: net-neutrality Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 11)
- Re: net-neutrality JC Dill (Aug 12)