nanog mailing list archives
AS23724 oops? was Re: China prefix hijack
From: Rob Thomas <robt () cymru com>
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 13:04:00 -0500
Hi, team. Joe wrote:
Just wondering if this was a "Fat fingered" mistake or intentional...
I'm thinking "oops." Looking only for prefixes with the aspath " 4134 23724 23724 <end>," and only on 2010-04-08 UTC, we see 15210 prefixes announced. Of those, 9598 are allocated to CN, 11017 are allocated by APNIC, and 4193 are neither (LACNIC, AFRINIC, RIPE, ARIN). The prefixes are almost sequential as well. There are some few gaps. It ranges beginning with a prefix in 8/8 and ending with a prefix in 222/8. There are a wide range of networks of every sort. Nations involved, according to RIR records, include: Prefixes Country Code 9444 CN 2192 US 758 AU 448 CO 186 RU 139 ID 131 TH 122 JP 103 KR 101 EC 96 BR 91 IN 84 AR [ ... ] So I'm leaning towards "big oops." I'll see if we can find someone at AS23724 to ask, and perhaps assist if needed. Thanks, Rob. -- Rob Thomas Team Cymru https://www.team-cymru.org/ "Say little and do much." M Avot 1:15
Current thread:
- Re: China prefix hijack, (continued)
- Re: China prefix hijack Paul Vixie (Apr 09)
- Re: China prefix hijack Dobbins, Roland (Apr 09)
- Solar Flux (was: Re: China prefix hijack) Robert E. Seastrom (Apr 11)
- Re: Solar Flux (was: Re: China prefix hijack) Michael Dillon (Apr 11)
- Re: Solar Flux (was: Re: China prefix hijack) Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 11)
- Re: Solar Flux (was: Re: China prefix hijack) Micheal Patterson (Apr 11)
- Re: Solar Flux (was: Re: China prefix hijack) Scott Howard (Apr 11)
- RE: Solar Flux (was: Re: China prefix hijack) Joe (Apr 11)
- Re: Solar Flux (was: Re: China prefix hijack) Andy Koch (Apr 11)
- Re: Solar Flux Leigh Porter (Apr 12)
- AS23724 oops? was Re: China prefix hijack Rob Thomas (Apr 08)
- Re: China prefix hijack Andree Toonk (Apr 08)