nanog mailing list archives

Peering Exchange Configurations


From: Brad Fleming <bdflemin () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 11:02:36 -0500

Hello All,

First, apologies for the change in email address.. my work account was getting a little busy so I've moved my lists to my Gmail account. But onward..

I'm interested in peering exchange design. We are not lucky enough to have access to a peering exchange so I have no direct experience. My questions are as follows:

1) Is a private AS typically used for the exchange side of the session?
2) Are RFC1918 IPs typically used for the p2p links into the exchange?
3) Do peering exchanges typically remove their AS from the path advertised to exchange participants? 3a) If no: Do participants typically preference exchange-learned routes over other sources?
4) Do exchanges typically support the following address families?
      IPv4 Multicast
      IPv6 Unicast
      IPv6 Multicast

In exchanges where a route server is employed:
4) Do participants have a p2p link into a simple routing environment then multi-hop to a route server? 5) I see that Bird, OpenBDGd, and Quagga are all options for route server software. Does one of those packages stand out as the clear current choice for production peering exchanges?


I very much appreciate any responses.

--
Brad Fleming


Current thread: