Re: ARIN IP6 policy for those with legacy IP4 Space

["John Palmer \(NANOG Acct\)" <nanog2 () adns net>]

Yah, thats what we are thinking here. We'll probably stick with IP4 only.

Sounds like ARIN has set a trap, so that virtually any contact with them
will result in the ceding of legacy rights. 

We'll be sure to avoid any such contact. 

Thanks everyone for the info.

John
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Joe Greco" <jgreco () ns sol net>
To: "Owen DeLong" <owen () delong com>
Cc: "NANOG list" <nanog () nanog org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 3:31 PM
Subject: Re: ARIN IP6 policy for those with legacy IP4 Space


> It's not the initial assignment fee that's really an impediment, it's
> moving from a model where the address space is free (or nearly so) to
> a model where you're paying a significant annual fee for the space.
>
> We'd be doing IPv6 here if not for the annual fee.  As it stands, there
> isn't that much reason to do IPv6, and a significant disincentive in the
> form of the fees.
>
> ... JG
> --