nanog mailing list archives
Re: what about 48 bits?
From: Jorge Amodio <jmamodio () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2010 22:29:47 -0500
The N connectors were easier to deal with than the vampire taps. To add a node, you just "spliced" a new xceiver box onto the line where you needed it by screwing a new length of cable into the new + existng xceivers, then connecting the AUI drop cable from the box to the node.
I've to say it, the AUI cables were an absolute pain in the ass to deal with. We had also a thick coax with the vampire taps and AUI fan outs from Excellan. Dealing with the coax was not that bad since we made an inverted U and had a coax run on each of the two vertical raisers this particular building had. The biggest challenge was to go from the raiser using the existing horizontal conduits that were not that big, and run the AUI from the XCVR to the fanout unit and then from that unit to each desk. Before going to 10BaseT we used pre-standard LattisNet from SynOptics, getting rid of the AUI was a relief. Cheers Jorge
Current thread:
- Re: what about 48 bits?, (continued)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Jon Lewis (Apr 05)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 05)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Patrick W. Gilmore (Apr 05)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 05)
- Re: what about 48 bits? joel jaeggli (Apr 05)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Jon Lewis (Apr 06)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 05)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Larry Sheldon (Apr 05)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Jon Lewis (Apr 05)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Michael Sokolov (Apr 04)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Mark Smith (Apr 04)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Jim Burwell (Apr 04)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Jorge Amodio (Apr 04)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Steven Bellovin (Apr 04)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Jorge Amodio (Apr 04)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Mark Smith (Apr 04)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Joe Greco (Apr 07)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Stefan Bethke (Apr 07)