nanog mailing list archives
Re: legacy /8
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2010 07:50:08 +0900
The fact is that lack of fastpath support doesn't matter until IPv6 traffic levels get high enough to need the fastpath.Yeah, fortunately, the fact that your router is burning CPU doing IPv6 has no impact on stuff like BGP convergence.
and, after all, if ipv6 takes off, we plan to throw away our investment in current routers and buy new ones. gsrs and crss are cheap. i think this is a great thread. ten new entries in my .procmailrc. of course the person to whom you were responding was there looooong ago. randy
Current thread:
- Re: legacy /8, (continued)
- Re: legacy /8 Tore Anderson (Apr 04)
- Re: legacy /8 sthaug (Apr 04)
- Re: legacy /8 Daniel Roesen (Apr 04)
- Re: legacy /8 Randy Bush (Apr 04)
- Re: legacy /8 David Conrad (Apr 04)
- Re: legacy /8 Christopher Morrow (Apr 04)
- Re: legacy /8 Christopher Morrow (Apr 04)
- Re: legacy /8 joel jaeggli (Apr 04)
- Re: legacy /8 Christopher Morrow (Apr 04)
- Re: legacy /8 Franck Martin (Apr 05)
- Re: legacy /8 Randy Bush (Apr 04)
- NAT444 vs IPv6 (was RE: legacy /8) Lee Howard (Apr 07)
- Re: NAT444 vs IPv6 (was RE: legacy /8) David Conrad (Apr 09)
- Re: legacy /8 Mark Smith (Apr 02)
- Re: legacy /8 jim deleskie (Apr 03)
- RE: legacy /8 George Bonser (Apr 02)
- Re: legacy /8 bmanning (Apr 02)
- Re: legacy /8 James Hess (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 jim deleskie (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 Mark Andrews (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 Jim Burwell (Apr 02)