nanog mailing list archives
Re: legacy /8
From: Zaid Ali <zaid () zaidali com>
Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2010 14:50:22 -0700
On 4/4/10 2:04 PM, "Vadim Antonov" <avg () kotovnik com> wrote:
Zaid P.s. Disclaimer: I have always been a network operator and never a dentist.I would have thought opposite.
It is sometimes helpful to draw lessons from nature and other systems :)
People who have been on this list longer would probably remember when I was playing in this sandbox. The real wisdom about networks is "never try to change everything and everywhere at once". You either do gradual migration, or you end up in a big pile of poo. Which what IPv6 transition situation is. --vadim
I too apply the same "real wisdom" and view IPv6 transition as a gradual migration and we are seeing a lot of success already with this approach, its just that the adoption numbers are slower than we would like. I get a sense that our 5+ year IPv6 discussions have people worried and panicked that the best thing is to leave things as they are <insert NAT solutions> which makes me think we should perhaps spend less time on the advocacy part of IPv6 solution and put our efforts on what we get out of implementation. Zaid
Current thread:
- Re: legacy /8, (continued)
- Re: legacy /8 David Conrad (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 Randy Bush (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 Mark Smith (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 David Barak (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 Mark Smith (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 Vadim Antonov (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 Adrian Chadd (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 Dan White (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 Zaid Ali (Apr 04)
- Re: legacy /8 Vadim Antonov (Apr 04)
- Re: legacy /8 Zaid Ali (Apr 04)
- Re: legacy /8 joel jaeggli (Apr 04)
- Re: legacy /8 Mark Smith (Apr 04)
- Re: legacy /8 James Hess (Apr 03)
- RE: legacy /8 Stephen Repetski (Apr 03)
- RE: legacy /8 Frank Bulk (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 William Warren (Apr 11)
- Re: legacy /8 Paul Vixie (Apr 11)
- Re: legacy /8 Owen DeLong (Apr 11)
- Re: legacy /8 David Conrad (Apr 11)
- Re: legacy /8 Paul Vixie (Apr 11)