nanog mailing list archives
Re: iabelle francois
From: Jeroen van Aart <jeroen () mompl net>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 13:56:37 -0700
Ted Cooper wrote:
On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 23:22 -0400, Eric Carroll wrote:On 10-04-21 06:59 PM, Jeroen van Aart wrote:The url redirects to a Canadian med site.Just FYI, it's not a real Canadian med site. It is high probabilitynot even Canadian.Posting so many URLs which either are or should be listed in domain block lists to a list with as many subscribers as this is probably not wise. I'm guessing you just caused a wonderful bounce storm as the NANOG servers attempted to send that out, depending of course on how many people whitelist NANOG to URI filtering.
I would say one has their spamfilter configured incorrectly if such emails would be rejected and it should prompt an immediate fix.
The mailinglist should ideally be whitelisted. In addition if you use content scanning (in almost all cases a bad idea, see: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8528672.stm ) your scanners ought to be trained well enough to figure out the email is not spam.
Regards, Jeroen -- http://goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/
Current thread:
- iabelle francois Charles Morris (Apr 20)
- Re: iabelle francois Jeroen van Aart (Apr 21)
- Re: iabelle francois Eric Carroll (Apr 22)
- Re: iabelle francois Ted Cooper (Apr 22)
- Re: iabelle francois John Palmer (NANOG Acct) (Apr 22)
- Re: iabelle francois Ted Cooper (Apr 23)
- Re: iabelle francois Jeroen van Aart (Apr 27)
- Re: iabelle francois Eric Carroll (Apr 22)
- Re: iabelle francois Jeroen van Aart (Apr 21)