nanog mailing list archives
Re: legacy /8
From: bmanning () vacation karoshi com
Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2010 00:32:28 +0000
On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 09:25:08AM +0900, Randy Bush wrote:
IPv6 as effectively reindroduced classful addressing.but it's not gonna be a problem this time, right? after all, 32^h^h128^h^h^h64 bits is more than we will ever need, right? randy
well... looking at a diet analogy, when .gt. 50% of your diet is HFCS and filler, its not real healthy. the way most folks are using IPv6, .gt. 50% of the bits are wasted as filler (got to love me some ::) so it seems like a lot, yet folks have already predicted the demise of IPv6 in the next 20years. (Klensin I think it was) --bill
Current thread:
- Re: alt.folklore.nanog, (continued)
- Re: alt.folklore.nanog Jeroen van Aart (Apr 14)
- Re: legacy /8 Steven Bellovin (Apr 02)
- Re: legacy /8 Michael Dillon (Apr 02)
- Re: legacy /8 Jeffrey I. Schiller (Apr 02)
- Re: legacy /8 Mark Smith (Apr 02)
- Re: legacy /8 Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 Matthew Kaufman (Apr 02)
- Re: legacy /8 Barry Shein (Apr 02)
- Re: legacy /8 bmanning (Apr 02)
- Re: legacy /8 Randy Bush (Apr 02)
- Re: legacy /8 bmanning (Apr 02)
- Re: legacy /8 jim deleskie (Apr 02)
- Re: legacy /8 Robert Brockway (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 David Conrad (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 Larry Sheldon (Apr 02)
- Re: legacy /8 Michael Thomas (Apr 02)
- RE: legacy /8 Joe Johnson (Apr 02)
- Re: legacy /8 Majdi S. Abbas (Apr 02)
- RE: legacy /8 Mikael Abrahamsson (Apr 02)
- Re: legacy /8 bmanning (Apr 02)