nanog mailing list archives

Re: Mail Submission Protocol


From: Leen Besselink <leen () consolejunkie net>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 16:16:57 +0200

On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:05:34AM -0400, Mike Walter wrote:
We have had very good luck with using port 587 and requiring the users
to authenticate to send email from outside our network. 

Inside customers, we have not changed to force port 587 and
authentication for email clients, but the topic has come up in
discussions.  This won't of course, stop spammers if they are hijacking
the users local email client settings.


It does however help find the user more easily (if the mailserver logs the username),
you can even automate sending an email to them and block them from sending any further
email (with exception to support-staff for example).

-Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: Claudio Lapidus [mailto:clapidus () gmail com] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 9:49 AM
To: nanog () nanog org
Subject: Mail Submission Protocol

Hello all,

At our ISP operation, we are seeing increasing levels of traffic in our
outgoing MTA's, presumably due to spammers abusing some of our
subscribers'
accounts. In fact, we are seeing connections from IPs outside of our
network
as many as ten times of that from inside IPs. Probably all of our
customers
are travelling abroad and sending back a lot of postcards, but just in
case... ;-)

So we are considering ways to further filter this traffic. We are
evaluating
implementation of MSA through port 587. However, we never did this and
would
like to know of others more knowledgeable of their experiences. The
question
is what best practices and stories do you guys have to share in this
regard.
Also please let me know if you need additional detail.

thanks in advance,
cl.




Current thread: